The High Court held that the Civil Revision Petition had become infructuous as the period of disqualification had expired. The matter was disposed of without granting further directions regarding future recovery proceedings.
None; the Civil Revision Petitions were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2017/13TH CHAITHRA, 1939 CRP(WAKF).NO. 525 OF 2015 ()
----------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN WOA.3/2005 AND WOA.9/2008 OF WAKF TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM DATED 12-05-2015
PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT:
MOHAMMED HASHIM ISMAIL SAIT @ IQBAL SAIT MUTHAWALLI HAJI USMAN HAJI ALLA-RIKHYA AND AYOOB HAJI ABDUL RAHIMAN TRUST SILATTUPARAMBA, MATTANCHERRY, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
R2 BY ADV. SRI.ESM.KABEER R BY SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA, SC, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD
THIS CRP (WAKF ACT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ALONG WITH CRPWK. 551 OF 2015 ON 03.04.2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2017/13TH CHAITHRA, 1939
----------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN WOA.3/2005 AND WOA.9/2008 OF WAKF TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM DATED 12.05.2015
PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT:
MOHAMMED HASHIM ISMAIL SAIT @ IQBAL SAIT MUTHAWALLI HAJI USMAN HAJI ALLA-RIKHYA AND AYOOB HAJI ABDUL RAHIMAN TRUST SILATTUPARAMBA, MATTANCHERY, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
R2 BY ADV. SRI.ESM.KABEER R BY SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA, SC, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD
THIS CRP (WAKF ACT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ALONG WITH CRP(WAKF) NO.525 OF 2015 ON 03.04.2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. CHITAMBARESH &
SATHISH NINAN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.R.P(wakf) Nos.525 & 551 of 2015
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 03rd day of April, 2017
O R D E R
V. CHITAMBARESH, J.
The period of disqualification has already run out and the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
The sustainability of the recovery proceedings if any
initiated later shall be decided at the time.
No further directions are warranted.
The Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of.
Sd/-
V. CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE.
Sd/SATHISH NINAN, JUDGE.
vsv
/true copy/
P.S. To Judge
Mohammed Hashim Ismail Sait @ Iqbal Sait Muthawalli Haji Usman Haji Alla-Rikhya and AyooB Haji Abdul Rahiman Trust
The Kerala Wakf Board
H.M. Shamshad
V. Chitambaresh
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
