The Director General of Prosecution (Admn) v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2017/11TH PHALGUNA, 1938
RP.No. 168 of 2017 (D) IN WP(C).36440/2015
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION (ADMN), KERALA,PANAKKAL TOWERS,KOMBARA,KOCHI-682018.
BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.RAVINDRANATH
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT IN THE W.A.:
- UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,FINANCE DEPARTMENT-110001.
- CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,NEW DELHI-110001.
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,IS PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM,COCHIN-682018.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the judgment delivered on 14/12/2016 precludes Government deductors from claiming benefits under Circular No.7/2014 dated 04/03/2014.
Whether the review petitioner is entitled to a review based on the issuance of the aforementioned Circular.
Whether the impugned order should be remanded or disposed of in view of the Circular.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Director General of Prosecution (Admn), Kerala
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Central Board of Direct Taxes
- respondent
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Ernakulam
- respondent
Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3)
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court