Yohannan @ Johny v. Mercy Johny
Case brief
What is this about?
This matrimonial appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither party appeared before the court, despite being posted for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/2ND PHALGUNA, 1938
Mat.Appeal.No. 410 of 2008
JUDGMENT DATED 02-04-2008 IN OP 881/2006 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS::
1. YOHANNAN @ JOHNY, AGED 38 YEARS, MANNARKULATHU VEEDU, NALLISSERI MURI, ANIKKADU VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK.
2. OUSEPH PHILIPOSE, AGED 73 OF DO.
3. ANNAMMA, AGED 65 YEARS, W/O.OUSEPH PHILIPOSE OF DO.
BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER::
MERCY JOHNY, AGED 30, D/O.ANTONY DEVASSYA, ILLYMOOTTIL VEEDU, MADAPPALLY MURI, MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.SEBASTIAN
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-02-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
msv/
V.K.MOHANAN & P.D.RAJAN, JJ
Mat. Appeal No.410 of 2008
....................................... Dated 22nd January, 2015
JUDGMENT
V.K.MOHANAN, J
Though the above appeal was specifically posted in the supplementary list today, to ascertain whether the parties are ready for mediation or not, there is no representation for the appellant as well as respondent. Therefore, the above appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE
P.D.RAJAN, JUDGE
lgk
YOHANNAN @ JOHNY
OUSEPH PHILIPOSE
ANNAMMA
MERCY JOHNY
V.MOHANAN
P.D.RAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court