which he or she is being summoned and only after satisfaction of the purpose court need issue summons to such witness. So, under such circumstances, since the petitioner did not mention the purpose for which the witness has to be examined, the court below cannot be blamed for declining to grant permission to summon the witness. Further, the 6th witness who is the mother of the petitioner is a party to one of the proceedings and as such, a party witness cannot be examined by another party as of right without leave of the court and such leave can be granted by the court only in exceptional cases. So, under such circumstances, the court below was perfectly justified in coming to the conclusion that the 6th witness also cannot be examined for the reason mentioned above. But, however, if the 6th witness, who is the mother of the petitioner and a party to one of the petitions pending which is being jointly tried, wants to examine herself as a witness, then, the dismissal of this application will not prevent her from being examined as a party witness to prove her case in the matter.
