Binitha v. Hareendran
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/26TH MAGHA, 1938
OP (FC).No. 268 of 2014 (R)
I.A.NO.3051/2013 IN O.P.NO.405/10 OF FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM
PETITIONER:
BINITHA, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.BALACHANDRAN,CHAITHRAM,THEKKEMURI, KIZHAKKE KALLADA VILLAGE,KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.C.RAJENDRAN SRI.K.R.RANJITH
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
HAREENDRAN
S/O.VENUGOPALAN,JHARINIVAS,KUNNATHUR P.O,SASTHAMKOTTA TALUK,KOLLAM DISTRICT 690 521
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-022017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP (FC).No. 268 of 2014 (R)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE DOCUMENT SALE DEED DATED 24-10-2012
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE PETITION AS I.A NO 351/2013 SUPPORTED BY AN AFFIDAVIT FOR RETURNING THE ORIGINAL OF THE SALE DEED TO THE PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE PHOT COPY OF THE THE SAID ORDER DATED 30-01-2014
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J &
K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * *** O.P.(F.C.) No.268 of 2014
Dated this the 15th day of February 2017
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique, J
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original
petition has become infructuous.
Hence this original petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(sd/-)
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
(sd/-) (K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE)
jsr
Binitha
Hareendran
A.M. Shaffique
K. Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court