Paroli Unneen v. Sri.K.Abdul Nassar
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt of Court case filed for non-compliance of a prior judgment. The petitioner submitted that directives have been complied with. The court closed the case accordingly.
Contempt of Court case filed for non-compliance of a prior judgment. The petitioner submitted that directives have been complied with. The court closed the case accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/21ST AGRAHAYANA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 847 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).39953/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 39953/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-02-2017
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
PAROLI UNNEEN AGED 51, MOHAMAD HAJI, PAROLI HOUSE, PANG P.O, KURUVA VILLAGE, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.POULOSE
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
SRI.K.ABDUL NASSAR AGED 45 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KURUVA VILLAGE, VATTALUR P.O, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 507.
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 847 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).39953/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A: CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 16.2.2017 IN WP(C) NO.39953/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O(C) No.847 of 2017
Dated this the 12th day of December, 2017
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner
complaining that the direction contained in the judgment dated 16.2.2017 is not complied with.
Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel
for the petitioner submitted that the directives are complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
dlk/12/12/
Paroli Unneen
K. Abdul Nassar
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court