Ambily K.S v. Dr. A.M. Ramanunny
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the proprietor of the High Court found that the petitioner was relieved of duties before the directions were issued. The court expressed satisfaction that the respondent did not willfully overlook court directions and closed the proceedings without punishment. Additionally, the court ordered a service of the appeal order on the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed to the extent of contempt; order in appeal to be served on petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1723 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 31108/2017 of THIS HON'BLE COURT.
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
AMBILY K.S, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. SHIVADASAN, NOW RESIDING AT TC 38/1919, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.C.DHEERAJ RAJAN
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):
DR. A.M. RAMANUNNY, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE CONSUMERS FEDERATION, GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 020.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent complied with the High Court's directions to consider the petitioner's application for transfer.
Whether any informational order in the petitioner's appeal passed before the convenor requires service of a copy on the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ambily K.S
- respondent
Dr. A.M. Ramanunny
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court