Contempt case where petitioner alleged non-compliance with directives. Court satisfied compliance despite outcome mismatch with petition, closing the case but leaving liberty to pursue action against the order.
Contempt case closed leaving open liberty to petitioner to pursue action against respondent order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/21ST AGRAHAYANA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1830 of 2017 (S)
-------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).25316/2017 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 23.8.17
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P(C):
SANTHOSH CYRIAC, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. KURIAKOSE, MECHANIC, KSRTC, VAIKOM DEPOT, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C):
SRI. HEMACHANDRAN, IPS, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), MANAGING DIRECTOR , KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 023.
R BY SHRI.T.P SAJAN, SC, KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
EL
Con.Case(C).No. 1830 of 2017 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURE
A1 JUDGMENT IN WPC.25316/2017 DATED 23.8.2017
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE
NIL TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE
EL
SHAJI P.CHALY, J.
========================
Cont.Case (C)No.1830 of 2017
======================== Dated this the 12th day of December 2017
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment to consider and dispose of Ext.P6 in accordance with law, is not complied with.
sd/
SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE
jm/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the directives in the underlying judgment regarding Ext.P6 were complied with.
SANTHOSH CYRIAC
SRI. HEMACHANDRAN
SHAJI P.CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
