C.Ravi v. P.Marykutty
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed applications for a contempt suit: court to be assessed on the basis of the directions issued by this Court has been complied with this case is closed. This case is closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed on submission that the court's direction was complied with.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/7TH ASHADHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 716 of 2017 (S)
THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.18548/2016 DATED 30/05/2016.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
C. RAVI, S/O.C.CHAMI, AGED 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHENNATH HOUSE, 5/319, EZHAVA ILLAM, DURGA LANE, PUTHUR, PALAKKAD-678 001.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON, SRI.P.S.APPU, SRI.A.R.NIMOD.
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
P. MARYKUTTY, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD-678 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Ravi
- respondent
P. Marykutty
Coram
P.B.Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court