Single-paragraph contempt order where the court accepted the petitioner's submission of compliance and closed the case without prejudice.
Contempt case closed without prejudice to the right to challenge the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/6TH ASHADHA, 1939 Con.Case(C).No. 659 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).22031/2016 ----------------------------------------------------IN WP(C) 22031/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S)/WRIT PETITIONER:
----------------------------
T.K.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 79, S/O.LATE MADHAVAN PILLAI, MADHAVA MANDIRAM, CHATHANKERY MURI, PERINGARA VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689108.
BY ADVS. JOSEPH GEORGE BIJO THOMAS GEORGE NICEY A. MENON
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
----------------------------
R.GIRIJA I.A.S., AGED ABOUT 47,FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689645.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER S. KANNAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rvs.
Con.Case(C).No. 659 of 2017 (S) IN WP(C).22031/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30/06/20147 IN WP(C) 22031/2016 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
ANNEXURE A2 PHOTOCOPY OF POSTAL A/D CARD DATED 31/10/2016.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
rvs.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
===================
Cont.Case(C). No.659 of 2017
======================= Dated this the 27th day of June, 2017
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the direction issued by this court has been complied with. In the circumstances, the contempt case is closed without prejudice
to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order issued by the respondent pursuant to the direction issued by this court.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
//True copy//
vgd
PA To Judge
T.K. Balakrishna Pillai
R. Girija I.A.S.
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
