K.P.Paul v. S.M.Vijayanand
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt case was closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the underlying order in appropriate proceedings, as orders were passed pursuant to the court's directions.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order passed in appropriate proceedings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2017/14TH ASHADHA, 1939 Con.Case(C).No. 513 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).33378/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE WPC:
K.P. PAUL, MANAGING DIRECTOR, S/O.OUSEPH PAILY, AGED 59 YEARS, M/S. PEARL ROYAL INTERNATIONAL HOTELS & RESORTS PVT. LTD., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.A.SHAJI (SR.) SMT.NAMITHA JYOTHISH SRI.ATHUL SHAJI
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 IN THE WPC: ---------------------------------------------
1. S.M.VIJAYANAND
AGED ABOUT 59, (NAME AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, STATE OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN-695 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.P. Paul
- respondent
S.M. Vijayanand
- respondent
Rishi Raj Singh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court