Central Bank of India v. Smt.Radhamani
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed a contempt of court case after the petitioner submitted that the direction issued by the Court had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2017/14TH ASHADHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1016 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 38539/2016 DATED 24-05-2017
-------------
PETITIONER:
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE,ERNAKULAM NORTH, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY REGIONAL MANAGER.
BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.) SMT.K.S.SANTHI
SMT.LATHA SUSAN CHERIAN
RESPONDENT(S):
SMT.RADHAMANI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,SUB REGISTRAR,KARAKULAM, TRIVANDRUM,PIN-695001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI S.KANNAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.V.
COC 1016 OF 2017:
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24/5/2017 WPC NO 38539/16.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.S.TO JUDGE
K.V.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
--------------------------------------------
Contempt of Court Case (C).No.1016 of 2017
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 5th day of July, 2017
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the direction issued by this Court has been complied with. In the light of the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE
rsr
Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Ernakulam North
Radhamani
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court