Rajendran v. M.G.Rajamanikyam
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case filed against方向 for non-compliance with a directive, the petitioner submitted that the direction had been complied with. The court accepted the submission and closed the case without any further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed based on petitioner's submission of compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2017/13TH ASHADHA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 860 of 2017 (S)
INTERIM ORDER IN WP(C) 10279/2017 DATED 27-03-2017.
PETITIONER:
RAJENDRAN M., S/O.MADHAVAN AGED 53, PUNNAVILA VEEDU, ALUMOODU PO, MUKHATALA, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.S.MANILAL SRI.S.NIDHEESH
RESPONDENTS:
1. M.G.RAJAMANIKYAM, I.A.S, FATHER'S NAME
- & AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, NOW WORKING AS THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajendran M.
- respondent
M.G. Rajamanikyam
- respondent
P.M. Sharaf Muhammed
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court