Muhammed Haneefa v. Sarangadharan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case filed for non-compliance of an interim order in a writ petition, the Court held that directives were complied with albeit belatedly and closed the case without imposing any penalty.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1692 of 2017 (S)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 17012/2017 DATED 24-05-2017
----------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
MUHAMMED HANEEFA, S/O. ABDUL KHADAR, AGED 40 YEARS, CHENNARKKATU HOUSE, P.O.PERDALA, KASARAGODE.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL
RESPONDENT/6TH RESPONDENT:
SARANGADHARAN,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUHAMMED HANEEFA
- respondent
SARANGADHARAN
Coram
SHAJI P. CHALY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court