Dismissed
Manoj Kottaaram v. Sri.S.Suhas
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1368/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/26TH SRAVANA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1368 of 2017 (S)
JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 20714/2017 DATED 22-06-2017.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
MANOJ KOTTAARAM, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.NEELAKANTAN, "KOTTAARAM", P.B.NO.5, KALPETTA, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673 121.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI SRI.T.K.SANDEEP SRI.ARJUN SREEDHAR SRI.ARUN KRISHNA DHAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 2:
1. SHRI.S.SUHAS(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KALPETTA, WAYANAD-673121.
2. SHRI.K.M.RAJU(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (ADM), WAYANAD-673121.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.KANNAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-08-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
Con.Case(C).No. 1368 of 2017 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:
| ANNEXURE I : | A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.6.2017 IN WPC.NO.20714/2017 L. |
|---|---|
| ANNEXURE II: | A TRUE COPY OF THE SAID COMMUNICATION |
| DATED 10.7.2017 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. | |
| ANNEXURE III: | A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 10.7.2017 |
| SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. |
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
mbr/
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
==================
Cont.Case (Civil) No.1368 of 2017
---------------------------------------------Dated this the 17th day of August, 2017
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions contained in the judgment have been complied with. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt of Court Case is closed.
sd/-
SKS
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
MANOJ KOTTAARAM
SHRI.S.SUHAS
SHRI.K.M.RAJU
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court