This appeal against a judgment in a writ petition was dismissed after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the directions of the original judgment had been complied with, leading the court to close the contempt case.
The Contempt of Court Case was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2017/26TH SRAVANA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 1072 of 2017 (S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).28105/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S):
MARTHOMA COLLEGE, THIRUVALLA 689 103, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.) SMT.K.S.SANTHI
RESPONDENT(S):
SMT.R.GIRIJA D/O RAVEENDRAN NAIR, AGED 55 YEARS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OFFICE OF DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S. KANNAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-08-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
EL
Con.Case(C).No. 1072 of 2017 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1- CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.8.2016 IN WPC. NO.28105/2016 ANNEXURE A2COPY OF LETTER DATED 11.11.2016 TO THE RESPONDENT
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.S. TO JUDGE
EL
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
==================
Cont.Case (Civil) No.1072 of 2017
Dated this the 17th day of August, 2017
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions contained in the judgment have been complied with. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt of Court Case is closed.
sd/-
SKS
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
MARTHOMA COLLEGE, THIRUVALLA
SMT.R.GIRIJA
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
