A.M.Mathai v. P.M.Yeldo
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala appointed an arbitrator to resolve a contractual dispute between partners. The Court found a valid arbitration clause in the partnership deed and directed the petitioner to submit a disclosure statement under the 1996 Act.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Sri. Sivadas as arbitrator and direction to petitioner to file disclosure statement under Section 11(8).
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1939
AR.No. 64 of 2017 ()
PETITIONER(S):
A.M.MATHAI, AGED 62,S/O.MATHAI, ARMAMKUZHI HOUSE, KEEZHILLAM P.O.- 683541, RAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM SRI.N.RAJESH
RESPONDENT:
P.M.YELDO, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O P.K. MATHAI, PALAKKATTUMALIL HOUSE, KEEZHILLAM P.O 683541, PERUMBAVOOR.
R1 BY ADVS. SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. SRI.VISHNU BHUVANENDRAN SMT.S.LEKHA SRI.P.K.ANTONY SRI.U.M.HASSAN SMT.P.PARVATHY
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court shall appoint an arbitrator in a dispute between partners covered by an arbitration clause in the partnership deed when the respondent fails to nominate one.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.M. Mathai
- respondent
P.M. Yeldo
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court