Technoline Engineering v. Smt. a.Shainamol IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt proceedings against a partnership firm were closed as the petitioner admitted compliance by stating the entire amount had been paid.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1939
Con.Case(C).No. 958 of 2017 (S)
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) .NO.39361/2016 DATED 09/01/2017)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION:
TECHNOLINE ENGINEERING, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT THOMSUN ANNEX,ACHUTHA WARRIAR LANE,M.G.ROAD, COCHIN-35, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, MR.THOMAS SKARIAH, SON OF LATE T.S.SKARIAH,AGED 46 YEARS.
BY ADV. SRI.PRAKASH P.GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 4 IN WRIT PETITION :
1. SMT. A.SHAINAMOL IAS, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN,VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 033.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Technoline Engineering
Coram
Shaji P. Chaly
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court