Disposed

Vishnu Prabhakar V.S v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Kerala HC9 Feb 2016WP(C)/615/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition concerning alleged malpractice during examinations, the Court directed the Vice Chancellor to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the matter within one month with notice to the petitioner, before disposing of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation with notice to the petitioner within one month.

Vishnu Prabhakar V.S Vs Mahatma Gandhi University — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/20TH MAGHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 615 of 2016 (B)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

VISHNU PRABHAKAR V.S, AGED 21 YEARS S/O V.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR, VADHYARUPARAMBIL HOUSE CHENDAMANGALAM P.O., NORTH PARAVUR ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN SRI.V.VINAY

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-686001 REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR.

¶11

2. VICE CHANCELLOR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS KOTTAYAM-686001.

¶12

3. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS KOTTAYAM-686001.

¶13

4. PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM-682013.

¶14

BY SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

WP(C).No. 615 of 2016 (B)

¶17

APPENDIX

¶18

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶19

EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 30.1.2015 IN WPC NO.3118/2015.

¶20

EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE PRO-VICE CHENCELLOR THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶21

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE EXAMINATION TIMETABLE. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGING PAYMENT OF EXAMINATION FEES THROUGH FRIENDS, KERALA.

¶22

EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET FOR THE 2ND SEMESTER SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION NOVEMBER 2014.

¶23

EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 5.1.2016 ALONG WITH POSTAL RECEIPT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶24

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A TO JUDGE

LSN

V. CHITAMBARESH, J.

¶29

W.P.(C). No. 615 of 2016

¶30

Dated this the 09^th day of February, 2016

¶31

JUDGMENT

¶32

The petitioner seeks early culmination of proceedings initiated against him. The same pertains to the alleged malpractice during the examination.

¶33

Ext.P2 representation submitted by the petitioner is pending consideration with the second respondent. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation with notice to the petitioner within one month.

¶34

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶35

V. CHITAMBARESH, Judge

¶36

lsn

Vishnu Prabhakar V.S v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu Prabhakar V.S v. Mahatma Gandhi University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.K Sali Vs Welfare Fund Inspector

M/S. Seaport Hotels Cochin (P) Ltd. Vs Elamkunnapuzha Gramapanchayath

Ameer Keloth Vs the Additional Registering Authority

P.Kumaran Vs State of Kerala

P.S.Tomy Vs the Thodupuzha Municipality

Sukumaran Vs the Regional Transport Authority