Disposed

Jayaprakashan v. Regional Transport Authority

Kerala HC22 Feb 2016WP(C)/5565/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed by an individual seeking early consideration of a temporary stage carriage permit application, the Kerala High Court directed the second respondent to consider the application with notice to the petitioner within two weeks, noting supporting letters from local authorities.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider the temporary permit application (Ext. P2) with notice to the petitioner within two weeks.

Jayaprakashan Vs Regional Transport Authority — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/3RD PHALGUNA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 5565 of 2016 (U)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

JAYAPRAKASHAN, AGED 55 YEARS S/O.BALAKURUP, CHUNDAKATTIL HOUSE, KOLARI P.O. MATTANNUR, THALASSERY, KANNUR PIN - 670 702.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.M.JITHESH MENON

¶9

RESPONDENTS:-:

¶10

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KANNUR, PIN - 670 002.

¶11

2. THE SECRETARY

¶12

REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, PIN - 670 002.

¶13

BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C).No. 5565 of 2016 (U)

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶18

EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGULAR STAGE CARRIAGE PERMIT FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 08.01.2016.

¶19

EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 04.02.2016.

¶20

EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT EVIDENCING PAYMENT DATED 04.02.2016.

¶21

EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE MEMBER OF LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MATTANNUR DATED 19.09.2015.

¶22

EXHIBIT P5. TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE HEAD MISTRESS OF THE MATTANNUR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL DATED 08.09.2015.

¶23

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS :- NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A. TO JUDGE.

DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J

¶28

W.P.(C). No. 5565 OF 2016

¶29

---------------------------------------- Dated this the 22^nd day of February, 2016

¶30

JUDGMENT

¶31

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext. P2 application for temporary permit. The petitioner relies on Exts. P4 and P5 letters to indicate the temporary need.

¶32

I direct the second respondent to consider Ext. P2 application with notice to the petitioner within two weeks. Exts. P4 and P5 letters shall be adverted to in the exercise.

¶33

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶34

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE

¶35

DCS

Jayaprakashan v. Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayaprakashan v. Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnadasan Vs Ratheesh

Babu Kurian Vs the Regional Transport Authority

Abdul Nazar P.K. Vs the Assistant Engineer

Pradeep Vs the Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Kollam

Joy Joseph Vs the Regional Transport Authority

K.a.Rasheed Vs the Secretary