Formerly disposed of a writ petition concerning the apprehension of demolition of a bus waiting shed, dismissing it as the apprehension was misplaced following the Government's decision not to dismantle it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/30TH MAGHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 3380 of 2016 (V)
PETITIONER:
ABDUL NAZAR P.K, AGED 48 YEARS S/O SAIDALAVI, KUNIYOT HOUSE, KOTTUPADAM MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673633.
BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, P.W.D.ROADS DIVISION OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER(P.W.D.), KONDOTTY MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673638.
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAZHAKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673640.
3. K.K.POKKERKUTTY, S/O.ABOOBACKER, KANDANKULANGARA HOUSE, VAZHAYOOR.P.O PIN-673633, KOTTUPADAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
4. THE VAZHAYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MALAPPURAM, PIN-673633.
5. THE TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE, MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM, PIN-676505.
R1, R2 & R5 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 3380 of 2016 (V)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS :- NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
W.P.(C). No. 3380 OF 2016
---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of February, 2016
JUDGMENT
The apprehension of the petitioner is that hasty steps would be taken to demolish the existing bus waiting shed. The Government Pleader on instructions submits that a decision has been taken pursuant to Ext. P3 judgment. It is further stated that it has been decided not to dismantle the waiting shed for the present. The apprehension of the petitioner is therefore misplaced.
No further directions are warranted and the writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
DCS
ABDUL NAZAR P.K
THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAZHAKKAD
K.K.POKKERKUTTY
THE VAZHAYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MALAPPURAM
THE TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE, MALAPPURAM
V. CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
