Petitioner sought registration of a vehicle in its name. Court directed first respondent to register the vehicle based on prior judgment and disposed of the writ petition.
First respondent directed to register the vehicle in the petitioner's name within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/19TH MAGHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 3641 of 2016 (E)
PETITIONER:
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD., 4TH FLOOR, THADIKARAN CENTRE, PALARIVATTOM COCHIN-682 025 REPRESETNED BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MUNNU ANTONY
BY ADVS.SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.T.R.KANNAN
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 020
2. SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER MAVELIKKARA, PIN-690 101
3. SANDEEP R
S/O RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, KATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE MANNARASALA PO, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA PIN-690 514
R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 3641 of 2016 (E)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF TEMPORARY REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REG. NO. KL-31-A-TEMP-25636 EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE CERTIFICATE (FORM NO. 21) RELATING TO THE VEHICLE, DT. 20/7/12 EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE ROAD WORTHINESS CERTIFICATE IN FORM NO. 22
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
W.P.(C). No. 3641 OF 2016
Dated this the 08th day of February, 2016
JUDGMENT
The issue is covered by the judgment dated 12.07.2011 in W.P.(C). No. 4554/2011. The first respondent is accordingly directed to register the vehicle covered by Exts. P1 to P3 documents in the name of the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
DCS
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C). No. 4554/2011Referred¶28
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.
The Regional Transport Officer Ernakulam
Sandeep R
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
