In this contempt of court case, the Kerala High Court held that the contempt had become infructuous as the impugned plans were shelved and a new project was under implementation, thereby closing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/29TH MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 32 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).17761/2015
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 17761/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 19.8.2015
PETITIONER(S):
APPUKUTTAN K AGED 53 YEARS S/O.KITTA, MEMBER, WARD NO.4 ELAPPULLI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PARA, ELAPPULLI 678 622 PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ
RESPONDENT(S):
MARYKUTTY IAS
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD 678 001.
R BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
CONT.CASE(C)NO. 32 OF 2016
Dated this the 18th day of February, 2016
JUDGMENT
The contempt case was posted along with W.P(C)
17761/2015 today. The counsel for the Panchayath was also heard.
for implementation of the new project. The contempt has for all practical purpose become infructuous.
The contempt case is closed.
V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE
sks
APPUKUTTAN K
MARYKUTTY
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD
V. CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
