Dr. Hema Rani R. v. Chairman, Kpsc
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/16TH CHAITHRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 3100 of 2005 (R)
PETITIONER(S):
DR.HEMA RANI.R., VENKIDACHALA BHAVAN, NETTAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-13.
BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. C.BOHAN, MALANCHARIKU VEEDU, THIRUPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 133.
4. AJITH KUMAR.S.S., H.S.A CHEMISTRY, D.V.N.M.HIGHER SECONDARY, SCHOOL MARANALLOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
ADDL.5. SRI VIJAYAKUMAR, DEPARTMENT OF RUSSIAN M.G. COLLEGE, PARUTHIPPARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
ADDL. 6. DR. R. GOPI, RETIRED HOD, DEPARTMENT OF RUSSIAN RESMI, MARAPALLAM GARDENS, RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION NO. 84 T.K DIVAKARAN ROAD, EAST PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (ADDL.R5 AND R6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN I.A NO.9961/2005 DATED 5.4.2016)
ADDL.7. SRI. AJITH KUMAR L RAJASREE, NEAR KIMS HOSPITAL, KUMARAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (ADDL.R7 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN I.A. NO.14285/2005 DATED 05.04.2016)
R,R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN R,ADDL.R6 BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A R,R7 BY ADV. SRI.L.MURALEEDHARAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
Dated this the 05th day of April, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner challenges the selection to the post of
Junior Higher Secondary School Teacher. The selection itself was of the year 2004 and the same was conducted through the Kerala Public Service Commission. The persons who were selected has also been appointed. The specific contention taken was that the written test was not properly carried out. At this distance of time there would be no purpose in considering the merits of the case, especially since the persons have been continuing for long in the
post in which they were appointed. The writ petition would stand
dismissed as infructuous.
jma
Sd/(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) //true copy//
P.A to Judge
DR.HEMA RANI.R.
THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
C. BOHAN
AJITH KUMAR.S.S.
SRI VIJAYAKUMAR
DR. R. GOPI
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court