In this education service matter, the High Court directed the Director of Public Instruction to consider a revision petition and afford a hearing within four months, disposing of the writ petition without adjudicating the merits.
Directed the 1st respondent to consider the revision petition and afford a hearing within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/15TH CHAITHRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 12987 of 2016 (W)
PETITIONER(S):
SREEDHARAN NAMBOOTHIRIPAD M. HSA (HINDI), KKM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL VANDITHAVALAM, VANDITHAVALAM PO CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT
BY ADVS. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION GOVT. SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PALAKKAD 678 001
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.A FAYAZ
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 12987 of 2016 (W)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
// TRUE COPY //
P.A TO JUDGE
SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== W.P.(C) No.12987 of 2016 - W
====================== Dated this the 4th day of April, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P6 revision petition filed before the 1st respondent. The revision petition is filed on 26.03.2016.
will have to look at the revision petition filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
SB/04/04/2016
// true copy //
P.A to Judge.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the 1st respondent is directed to consider the revision petition and afford an opportunity of hearing.
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of without considering the merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sreedharan Namboothiripad M. HSA (Hindi), KKM Higher Secondary School Vandithavalam
The State of Kerala, Rep. by the Secretary to Govt. Department of General Education
The Director of Public Instruction Thiruvananthapuram
The District Educational Officer Palakkad
K VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
