The High Court at Ernakulam, dealing with a writ petition (OP 8137 of 2002), recorded counsel's submission that the petition was infructuous and consequently dismissed it on April 5, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/16TH CHAITHRA, 1938
OP.No. 8137 of 2002 (R)
PETITIONER:
K. KUNCHU, MANKARA VEEDU, KOTTACKKAD, KALIPARA P.O., PALAKKAD, WORKER, (RETIRED) P.H. SUB DIVISION, MOOTHANTHARA,, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS. SRI.T.K.MARTHANDAN UNNITHAN SRI.K.P.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. KERALA WATER AAUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER, AUTHORITY, VELLAYAMBALAM, TRIVANDRUM.
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H. DIVISION,, KALMANTAPAM, PALAKKAD.
3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, SUB DIVISION,, MOOTHANTHARA, PALAKKAD-12.
4. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER (ESTABLISHMENT) KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN,, TRIVANDRUM-695 933.
R1 TO R4 BY ADV.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KWA
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
O.P. No. 8137 of 2002 (R)
Dated this the 5th day of April, 2016
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted on behalf of the learned Counsel
for the petitioner that the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
jjj 5/4/16
K. KUNCHU
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
