Sivakumar v. the Divisional Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 30192 of 2016 (Y)
PETITIONERS:
1. SIVAKUMAR S/O S. RAMADATHAN UNNI, AGED 44 YEARS, KANAVALLIL HOUSE, CHITTOOR P.O, KOCHI 27, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. JAYASREE, KANAVALLIL HOUSE, CHITTOOR P.O, KOCHI 27, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. PADMASREE, KANAVALLIL HOUSE, CHITTOOR P.O, KOCHI 27, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
4. NANDAKUMAR, KANAVALLIL HOUSE, CHITTOOR P.O, KOCHI 27, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES, ERNAKULAM.
2. THE COMMANDANT GENERAL, FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES HEAD QUARTERS, HOUSING BOARD JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN 695 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RON BASTIAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-12-2016 ALONG WITH W.P.(C) NO.30096/2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
smv
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
W.P.(C). Nos. 30096 & 30192 of 2016
Dated this the 8th day of December, 2016
JUDGMENT
Captioned writ petitions are filed by the petitioners
challenging non-issuance of NOC by the Fire and Rescue
Services for the building constructed by the petitioners.
petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petitions.
Permission granted and writ petitions are dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY
JUDGE //true copy//
P.A. To Judge
smv 08.12.2016
SIVAKUMAR S/O S. RAMADATHAN UNNI AND OTHERS
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES, ERNAKULAM AND THE COMMANDANT GENERAL FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court