Dismissed
Sajimon K.A v. C.a.Latha
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1964/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1964 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).29710/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 29710/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 06-09-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
SAJIMON K.A, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.ANIYAPPAN KANJIRATHIL HOUSE, PUTHENANGADI, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1. C.A.LATHA DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
2. SRI.K.G.SAMUEL DY. TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM - 686 002 (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
3. SRI.RAMACHANDRAN DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF AND MEMBER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM - 686 002 (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
4. SRI.PREMANANDAN, SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM - 686 002 (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1964 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).29710/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1: JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO.29710/2016 DATED 06.09.2016
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O(C). No.1964 of 2016
Dated this the 7th day of December, 2016
JUDGMENT
This contempt of court case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment
dated 6.9.2016 are not complied with.
special Government Pleader submitted, already the matter was placed before the RTA meeting held on 24.11.2016 and the directions issued by this Courts are complied. The same is recorded. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt of court case any further.
Contempt of court case is closed, accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY,JUDGE
dlk/7/12/
Sajimon K.A
C.A. Latha
K.G. Samuel
Ramachandran
Premanandan
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court