Disposed

Mathew Varghese v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Dec 2016WP(C)/1271/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction for the State to consider an application regarding land utilisation. The Court directed the second respondent to consider the application in accordance with law within a month of receipt of a copy of this judgment and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd respondent to take on board Ext.P1 application and consider in accordance with law within a month of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Mathew Varghese Vs State of Kerala — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938

¶5

WP(C).No. 1271 of 2014 (H)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

MATHEW VARGHESE, S/O.P.M.VARGHESE, VALLAPURACKAL HOUSE, THEKKEKARA.P.O., CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK.

¶8

BY ADVS.SMT.K.P.SANTHI SMT.BEENA JOHN SMT.K.VINAYA

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

¶11

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORTKOCHI - 682 001.

¶12

3. PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM - 682 030.

¶13

*4. AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, ALANGAD. ADDL. R5 IMPLEADED

¶14

5. THE CONVENOR, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, KRISHI BHAVAN, ALANGAD.

¶15

ADDL. R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 07.12.2016 IN IA.9446/2015.

¶16

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RON BASTIAN

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

mbr/

¶19

WP(C).No. 1271 of 2014 (H)

¶20

APPENDIX

¶21

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

¶22

P1. TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONERS APPLICATION DATED 2-12-13 SUBMITTED TO 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶23

P2. TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 26-4-2012 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

¶24

P3. TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 6-7-2012 SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶25

P4. TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 16-8-2012 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶26

P5. TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE NATURE OF THE LAND.

¶27

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.S. TO JUDGE

mbr/

SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

¶33

W.P.(C). No.1271 of 2014

¶34

Dated this the 7^th day of December, 2016

¶35

JUDGMENT

¶36

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking

¶37

direction to the 2^nd respondent to take a decision on Ext.P1application submitted by the petitioner under the provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order.

¶38

Having heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader, there will be a direction to the 2^nd respondent to take on board Ext.P1 application and consider the same in accordance with law, within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶39

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶40

Sd/-

¶41

SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE

¶42

smv 07.12.2016

Mathew Varghese v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mathew Varghese v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Silppi Realtors and Contractors [P] Ltd. Vs the Chief Engineer

Mrs.Neena R. Nair Vs Ennar Business Consultants

Sidheeq Kolothumthodika Vs State of Kerala

Sajimon K.A Vs C.a.Latha

Kansai Infra Structure and Developers Private Limited Vs State of Kerala

Krishnan C. Vs State of Kerala