Sunil.R v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, challenging passport retention, sought to withdraw the writ petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the writ petition permitted and the petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/28TH BHADRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 28717 of 2016 (L)
PETITIONER :
SUNIL.R., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. RAGHAVAN BHARATHAN, GOPALPETTA, KOTTIKULAM, TRIKKANNAD, BEKAL POST, KASARAGOD-671 318.
BY SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER,SENIOR ADVOCATE ADVS. SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA SRI.JOHN THITHEEMOS SMT.DIVYA S KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-110 001.
2. REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, PASSPORT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sunil.R.
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Regional Passport Officer, Passport Office, Kozhikode
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court