This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/28TH BHADRA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1421 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).19950/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19950/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 10-06-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):
N.MADHUSOODHARAN AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.SUKUMARAN, NADUVILEDATH HOUSE, PERUNNINAKULAM, IRUMPANAM P.O, ERNAKULAM NOW WORKING AS DRIVER GRADE II, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM DEPOT, P.F NO. 54322.
BY ADVS.SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.K.N.ABHILASH SRI.M.A.AHAMMAD SAHEER
RESPONDENT(S)/IST RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):
ANTONY CHACKO, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 689 023.
BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1421 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).19950/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.6.2016 IN W.P.(C) NO.19950/2016 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD ADDRESSED TO THE RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C) No.1421 of 2016
Dated this the 19th day of September, 2016
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed complaining that the judgment dated 10.6.2016 is not complied with.
counsel for the respondent submitted that already an order is passed on 17.9.2016 and the said order is produced for verification. Therefore, I do not think that anything survives further for pursuing the contempt case proceedings.
Leaving open the liberty of the petitioner to challenge the order dated 17.9.2016, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY,JUDGE
dlk/19/9/
N. MADHUSOODHARAN
ANTONY CHACKO
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
