Binzin Jose v. the Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner appeared without instructions; no substantive law or facts were considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/13TH ASWINA, 1938
WP(C).No. 27787 of 2014 (W)
PETITIONER(S):
BINZIN JOSE CHALLISSERY HOUSE, MISSION QUARTERS ROAD, EAST FORT P.O., THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD PALAKKAD-678 001.
2. THE SECRETARY
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001.
3. SRI. N.P.AJITHKUMAR S/O. PADMANABHAN, AISWARYA, ASHOKA ROAD, THRISSUR-680 002.
R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.PAUL VARGHESE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BKA/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
W.P.(C) No. 27787 of 2014
Dated this the 5th day of October, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
he has no instruction from the petitioner. Therefore, the
writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
bka/-
//True copy//
PA to Judge
BINZIN JOSE CHALLISSERY HOUSE
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court