The court closed the contempt case as the respondent complied with prior directions by passing appropriate orders, resulting in the recall of the non-bailable warrant issued against them.
Non-bailable warrant against respondent recalled; contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/16TH BHADRA, 1938 Con.Case(C).No. 74 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).28229/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28229/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 17-09-2015
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
RAJENDRAN.V, S/O.KARUNAN,AGED 50, 'KARUNA' HOUSE, PINARAYI P.O., THALASSERY.
BY ADV. SRI.MOHANAN V.T.K.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
DR.S.RATNAKUMARAN (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER), THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE CO-OP. CONSUMER FEDERATION LTD. (CONSUMER FED), GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 682 038.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN R BY SRI. E. M. POULOSE, SC(B/O) BY SMT.PRINCY XAVIER - GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AL/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
==================
Cont. Case (c) No.74/2016
==================
Dated this the 7th day of September, 2016 J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel that the directions contained in Annexure -A Judgment stands complied with by passing appropriate orders pursuant to Ext.P6 representation. Recording the above submission, the Contempt of Court case is closed.
The non-bailable warrant issued to the respondent stands hereby recalled.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
al/-
True copy
P.S to Judge
RAJENDRAN.V
DR.S.RATNAKUMARAN
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
