Mariyakutty v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged delay in mutation of property. Court directed 1st respondent to complete proceedings as per committee reports within three months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/4TH ASWINA, 1938
WP(C).No. 24617 of 2016 (B)
----------------------------
PETITIONER:
MARIYAKUTTY, W/O.THOMAS AGED 59 YEARS, VARABINAKATHUVEEDU, KULASEKHARAMANGALAM PO, VAIKOM.
BY ADVS.SMT.A.G.ANEETHA
SMT.M.KABANI DINESH SMT.MIJI JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 141.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mariyakutty
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office Vaikom, Kottayam District
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kottayam District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court