A writ petition was admitted on the same application day. The court directed the respondent to consider a replacement application with notice to the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of without further orders.
Direction to respondent to consider the application for vehicle replacement with notice to petitioner within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/21ST POUSHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 21 of 2016 (C)
PETITIONER:
TOMY GEORGE VAYALIKALAPURAYIL HOUSE, KADAVOOR, KOTHAMANGALAM
BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA 686661
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 21 of 2016 (C)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
W.P.(C). NO. 21 OF 2016
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext. P4 application for replacement of the vehicle. The vehicle is sought to be replaced by an older model vehicle which is a permissible exercise.
application with notice to the petitioner within a period of three weeks.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
DCS
TOMY GEORGE VAYALIKALAPURAYIL HOUSE, KADAVOOR, KOTHAMANGALAM
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA 686661
V. CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
