The court held that the directions in the judgment have been complied with. The contempt of court proceedings are closed at the report stage.
Contempt proceedings closed; petitioner free to challenge consequential orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/18TH POUSHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1568 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).2930/2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 2930/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 15-07-2014
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
DEVASSY E.L., AGED 58 YEARS S/O.LONAPPAN, ELUVATHINGAL HOUSE, THRIKKUR.P.O THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C):
JAMES VARGHESE, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
R BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 08-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
CONT.CASE (C)NO. 1568 OF 2015
Dated this the 8th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
The directions in the judgment have been complied
with. The petitioner is free to challenge the consequential
orders passed if he is aggrieved.
The contempt of court case proceedings are closed.
V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE
sks
Devassy E.L.
James Varghese
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
