Suresh v. the Matsyafed & Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged an order regarding promotion. The court dismissed the writ petition today as infructuous because the subject matter had become moot.
The petitioner challenged an order regarding promotion. The court dismissed the writ petition today as infructuous because the subject matter had become moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2016/31ST SRAVANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 16874 of 2007 (H)
PETITIONER(S) :
S.SURESH, S/O.SHAHUL HAMEED, DEPUTY MANAGER, MATSYAFED, HEAD OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. THE MATSYAFED (KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION) FOR FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT LTD.,, NO.F(T) 738 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MATSYA BHAVAN, KURAVANKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, MATSYAFED, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., FISHERIES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
5. K.B.SUBASHCHANDRAN,
PROJECT OFFICER, MATSYAFED, DISTRICT OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, S.C R3 & R4 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.S.SHEEJA R5 BY SRI.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SENIOR ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
SHAJI P. CHALY, J
W.P.(C)NO.16874 OF 2007
--------------------------------Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2016
J U D G M E N T
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging Ext.P11 order so far it relates to the 5th respondent, enabling him to get promotion to the post of Manager as senior to the petitioner in the service of the 1st respondent and for other related reliefs. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the subject matter has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
R.AV
S.SURESH
THE MATSYAFED (KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION) FOR FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT LTD.
THE GENERAL MANAGER, MATSYAFED, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
THE DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
STATE OF KERALA
K.B.SUBASHCHANDRAN
SHAJI P.CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court