K.P. Hamsa v. M. Ravindran
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge dismissed a contempt petition, holding that the underlying matter has become immaterial and redundant due to subsequent developments, thereby closing the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed as it became immaterial and redundant.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2016/31ST SRAVANA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1171 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).19311/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19311/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07-07-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:
1. K.P. HAMSA, AGED 51, S/O LATE ALAVI, KUZHIYILPEEDIKA HOUSE, CHANGILERI P.O, PALAKKAD.
2. ARSAL ERERATH, AGED 41, S/O ABDU ERERATH HOUSE, P ALLIKKUNNU P.O, KUMARAMPUTHUR P.O, PALAKKAD.
3.
JAMAL K.M, AGED 38, S/O MOIDU, KIZHAKKETHIL, PAYYANADAM P.O, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.P. Hamsa
- petitioner
Arsal Ererath
- petitioner
Jamal K.M
- respondent
M. Ravindran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court