Varghese Yohannan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 1076 of 2016 (H)
PETITIONER(S):
VARGHESE YOHANNAN
S/O.YOHANAN, VELUTHAPARACKAL HOUSE, UDAYAGIRI, PRAKASH PO, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685515
BY ADVS.SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN
SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN
SRI.K.A.ABHILASH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION) OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ASSIGNMENT, IDUKKI, PAINAVU PO, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685603
4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER
R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SURIN GEORGE IPE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 1076 of 2016 (H)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
| P1: | TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR PATT UNDER FORM 2 OF THE KERALA LAND ASSIGNMENT (REGULARISATION OF OCCUPATIONS OF FOREST LAND PRIOR TO 01.01.1977) SPECIAL RUES, 1993 DATED 06.12.2010 |
|---|---|
| P2: | TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 09.04.2012 |
| P3: | TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.04.2013 |
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL. //TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
-----------------------------------------W.P.(C) No. 1076 of 2016 (H)
Dated: 22nd November, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non consideration of an application filed for issuance of patta, produced at Ext.P1. The petitioner submits
that he has been orally informed by the office of the 3rd respondent that for various survey numbers there cannot be a single patta issued.
The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 3rd respondent.
Sd/K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
jjj 22/11/16
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Varghese Yohannan
State of Kerala
The District Collector
The Special Tahsildar
The Village Officer
K Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court