G. Velayudhan v. Mary Latha.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt Petition dismissed as the order was complied with. No substantive reasoning provided.
What did the court decide?
None. The contempt cases were closed due to compliance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1959 of 2016 (S)
JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25779/2014 DATED 11-07-2016.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
G.VELAYUDHAN, S/O GOPALAN, AGED 65, PLAVILA VADAKATHIL PUTHENVEEDU, KAITHAKODE.P.O, PUTHOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2 IN WP(C):
MARY LATHA,
AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, PAVITHRESWARAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KARIMPINPUZHA.P.O, PUTHOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691513.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. Velayudhan
- respondent
Mary Latha
Coram
Vinod Chandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court