Dincy v. Pradeep
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala listened to transfer petitions filed by husband and wife in concurrent family dispute proceedings. Weighing distance and health, the court transferred the divorce petition from Ernakulam to Irinjalakkuda Family Court.
What did the court decide?
Order Tr.P(C) No. 477/2016 allowed; O.P. 976/2016 transferred to Family Court, Irinjalakkuda along with O.P.s 613/2016 and 667/2016. Tr.P(C) Nos. 540/2016 and 539/2016 dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1938
Tr.P(C).No. 477 of 2016
OP 976/2016 OF FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:
DINCY, AGED 27 YEARS, D/O. DEVIS, MANIYARAKKAL HOUSE, CHAKKPPANPADY DESATH, MUPLIYAM, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR-680697.
BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
PRADEEP, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O JOSE, MUNDAN PUTHUSERRY HOUSE, NAYATHODE POST, CHETHIKOD, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683572.
BY ADV. SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether transfer petitions filed by husband and wife seeking venue change for mutual family litigation can be allowed considering distance and health grounds.
Whether the Family Court exercising jurisdiction over the divorce petition should be transferred to the court hearing related custody and maintenance matters.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dincy
- respondent
Pradeep
Coram
K. Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court