Musthafa v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses the civil revision petition by Order as per the registry clerks' default, as the application for condonation of delay was dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/30TH KARTHIKA, 1938
CRP.No. 917 of 2002
A.A.NO. 133/1995 OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY(LR), KANNUR
S.M.NO. 237/1988 OF LAND TRIBUNAL (SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LR), NILESHWAR
PETITIONERS IN C.R.P- RESPONDENTS 9 & 10 IN A.A.NO. PARTIES IN S.M :
1. MUSTHAFA, S/O.MARIYUMMA, RESIDING AT KUNNUMKAL, BEEMANDAY VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SAHEERA IN DO.
2. SAHEERA, W/O.MUSTHAFA, RESIDING AT THERUVIL, NILESHWAR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, POWER-OF-ATTORNEY, HOLDER OF PETITIONER NO.1, MUSTHAFA)
BY SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SENIOR ADVOCATE) ADVS. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition is maintainable after dismissal of the delay condonation application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUSTHAFA
- petitioner
SAHEERA
- respondent
CHERAMMAL AZEEZ
- respondent
CHERAMMAL ALIYUMMA
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court