Dr. Thomas v. Mrs. Nadine
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed a transfer petition as infructuous because the relevant cases had already been disposed of by the lower court, rendering the prayer without necessity.
What did the court decide?
None; petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1938
Tr.P(C).No. 258 of 2016 ()
TO TRANSFER OP 2268/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM TO ANY OTHER COMPETENT COURT.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
DR.THOMAS AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.P.T.OUSEPH, PATHIPARAMBAN HOUSE, KORATTY, MURINGOOR P.O., PIN - 680 309, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT CROWN 12 B, TRINITY FLAT, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI - 682 025.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
MRS.NADINE AGED 38 YEARS, W/O.THOMAS, 6-B GOLDEN RESIDENCY, OPP. TO ICICI BANK, S.A. ROAD, KOCHI - 680 025.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DR. THOMAS
- respondent
MRS. NADINE
Coram
K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court