Venkita Hari v. Kalidasan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala, on default, dismissed second appeals S.A. No. 877 of 1999 and S.A. No. 279 of 2001 due to non-appearance of the appellant.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of second appeals S.A. No. 877 of 1999 and S.A. No. 279 of 2001 for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2015/19TH ASHADHA, 1937
SA.No. 877 of 1999 (D)
----------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 119/1991 of II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD DATED 25-03-1999
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 656/1986 of ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, PALAKKAD DATED 20-12-1990
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
VENKITA HARI, S/O. RACHAKRISHNAN CHETTIAR, AGED 48 YEARS, PATTIKKARA, KOPPAM AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR SMT.K.P.SANTHI
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/4TH DEFENDANT:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Venkita Hari
- respondent
Kalidasan
Coram
P. Bhavadasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court