Muhammed Rafi v. Sarada
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second appeal regarding property disputes, the Court observed that the matter was settled via a compromise petition. The appeal was disposed of in terms of the lawful compromise, with half of the court fee refunded to the appellant.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal was disposed of in terms of the compromise petition filed by the parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2016/2ND CHAITHRA, 1938
RSA.No. 535 of 2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN A.S.NO.72/2009 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, OTTAPALAM DATED 28-12-2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.109/2005 OF SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM DATED 29-11-2008
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT :
MUHAMMED RAFI,
S/O. KOYATHIVEETTIL ABOOBACKER, MUNDAMUKA AMSOM, SHORNUR DESOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, P.O. SHORNUR (KOLAPPULLI)-6791 22, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT KUNNATHUKALAM HOUSE, SHORNUR VILLAGE, OTTAPPALAM TALUK, KULAPPULLY P.O.-6791 22, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MUHAMMED RAFI
- respondent
SARADA
- respondent
MANOHARAN
- respondent
PADMINI
- respondent
GEETHA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court