K. Geetha v. K. Radha
Case brief
What is this about?
This regular second appeal was dismissed for default as the appellant failed to file any representation, despite counsel appearing for the respondents claiming the matter was settled.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2016/3RD CHAITHRA, 1938
RSA.No. 1218 of 2012 (C)
-----------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS.NO. 150/2007 OF ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, THALASSERY DATED 31/10/2011)
(AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.2578/03 IN OS.NO.16/2002 OF ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, KANNUR DATED 30-11-2006)
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT :
K. GEETHA, AGED 52 YEARS, D/O. PANCHALI, PAYYANADAN HOUSE,
CHOVVA, KANNUR.
BY ADVS. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Geetha
- respondent
K. Radha Gopalan
- respondent
K. Santha Kumari
- respondent
K. Sarojini
- respondent
Prakashini.T.K.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court