The High Court dismissed a Second Appeal for non-prosecution, as there was no representation from the appellant when the case was called on the day it was finally heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/29TH ASWINA, 1938
SA.NO. 769 OF 1997 (G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29-01-1997 IN AS NO.21/1992 OF THE SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23-10-1991 IN OS NO.395/1990 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTARAKKARA
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
JAYANIVAS, KURUNGAL, PULAMEN, KIZHAKKEKARA, KOTTARAKKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATHAN NAIR
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DST
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of October, 2016
Though, the case stands for disposal, when the
case is called, there is no representation for the appellant. It could be presumed that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the matter.
Hence, this Second Appeal will stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
K. HARILAL,
JUDGE
DST
//True copy//
RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE
K. HARILAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
