M.O. Antony v. C.J. George
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition not submitted or no representation for appellants. Regular Second Appeal implicitly dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/21ST ASWINA, 1938
RSA.NO. 364 OF 2010 ( B)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS 120/2009 OF II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,ERNAKULAM DATED 10-03-2010
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 2139/2001 OF II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. M.O. ANTONY, S/O. QUSO, MANAPURATHU HOUSE, KANDANADU, KOTHADU P.O.
2. K.J.JOSEPH, S/O.K.V.JOSEPH, KAINIKKATTU HOUSE, KOTHADO P.O.
BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court