The appellant failed to pursue the appeal without providing instruction from the deceased sole appellant. The High Court of Kerala dismissed the second appeal as a default consequence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/28TH PHALGUNA, 1937
SA.No. 246 of 2000 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS. NO.320/1990 OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 30-03-1999. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS. NO.1000/1976 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 30-09-1989.
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
2. S. CHONDU AMMAL, AGED 65, WIFE OF LATE RAMA IYER, RESIDING AT TIPPU STREET, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. SREE MANGALESWARA SUBRAMONIA PARIPALITHA SATJANA SABHA, TIPPU STREET, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI.N. HARIKRISHNA IYER.
2. S. SANKARANARAYANA IYER, SECRETARY OF THE ABOVE SABHA, RESIDING AT TC 34/1583, SASTHAMKOVIL STREET, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH.
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
S.A.No.246 of 2000
Dated this the 18th day of March, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instruction from the appellant to pursue this matter. In the light of the said submission, this appeal is dismissed for default.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
smm
E. RAMA IYER et al.
SREE MANGALESWARA SUBRAMONIA PARIPALITHA SATJANA SABHA et al.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
