This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/27TH PHALGUNA, 1937
RSA.No. 1157 of 2012
AS.7/2009 OF FIRST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 25-01-2012 OS.111/2005 OF PRINCIPAL MUNNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 23-07-2008
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1/PLAINTIFF:
T.R.SHOBHANA, AGED 47 YEARS, KAIPRAVALAYIL HOUSE, VELLOOR DESOM, VELLOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.JOHN
SRI.B.JAYAPARAKASH
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.2/DEFENDANTS:
1. RAMAN NAIR, AGED 76 YEARS, S/O. KOCHUKALI, THEKKEPULIYATTU HOUSE, KEECHERI DESOM, KANJIRAMATTOM.P.O, KEECHERI VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 307.
2. USHA, AGED 47 YEARS, W/O. RAMAN NAIR, THEKKEPULIYATTU HOUSE KEECHERI DESOM, KANJIRAMATTOM.P.O, KEECHERI VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 307.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
R.S.A.No.1157 OF 2012
----------------------------------Dated this the 17th day of March, 2016
J U D G M E N T
~~~~~~~~~~~
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this regular second appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
Ps/18/3/16
//True copy//
PA to Judge
T.R.Shobhana
Raman Nair
Usha
P.B.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
